This is interesting.
I got a mailer from the Arizona Democratic Party
urging me to vote for the Libertarian for congress. Apparently they think that
they can get more bang for their campaign buck by trying to persuade people
to vote for the Libertarian rather than their own candidate.
Let's think about this. Let's say that the marginal benefit of getting a vote
to change from Republican to Democrat is two. That's the net change in total
votes that occurs when a vote for the R is reduced by 1 while the vote for
the D increases by 1. The net difference is 2. The net difference using their
new tactic is one. The vote for the R is reduced by 1, but the vote for the
D is unchanged.
Both of these net changes have to be multiplied by the probability that
the sought after change occurs. For the new tactic to make rational sense,
the
Arizona Democratic Party must believe that the probability of moving an R vote
to an L vote is more than twice the probability of moving it from R to D. That
may well be true.
It also says something about how compelling they think their argument is for
their own candidate. They seem to be using this tactic in other Arizona congressional races as
well.
No comments:
Post a Comment